Nature sees no reason to investigate climate papers


The general consensus among scientists is that the revelations don't change the science at all. The conclusions about anthropogenic global warming are derived from multiple sources of independent data and analysis. Even if it turned out that everything from the CRU were false, it would not actually change the conclusions, because it is only one source among many. And, as the Nature editorial argues, there isn't much there to suggest that the CRU's published works are false.

via Nature sees no reason to investigate climate papers.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s